Critique of Intermediate Video Project
for Growth Plan
Video Technology
Name of Producer: ________________ Date: __________
Title of Project: __________________ Team Members:___________________________________________________
| Criteria | Scale
|
| Creative Title | |
| Titles are effective for intended audience | |
| Titles in Flash | |
| Titles follow the visual rule of 60% to 40% | |
| Titles color scheme is media-pleasing | |
| Titles transitions enhance the project | |
| Titles content (spelling, spacing, readability, timing) well presented | |
| Music enhances project | |
| Digital Graphics enhance the project | |
| Audio is well mixed and edited | |
| Audio Transitions are smooth | |
| Video Transitions are smooth | |
| Creativity | |
| Camera Work enhances project | |
| Appropriate (multiple) camera angles | |
| Interview Skills / Commentary / Voiceover | |
| Interview / commentator provides forum to enhanced information | |
| Lighting enhances project | |
| Chroma Key work or Special Effects are appropriately implemented | |
| Length of project | |
| Editing takes advantage of the content | |
| Editing is well thought out | |
| Purpose of Video is clear | |
| Content covers the proposition | |
| Content is delivered in a creative and interesting manner | |
| Content appropriate to the intended audience | |
| Comments (may be assigned extra points by facilitator) | |
| Total Score |
54-45 = A 36-44=B 18-35=C Grade: _________
Evaluator's Name: ___________________________